Dorado

Dorado v. Crumb

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20213:20-cv-01936California1,513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DORADO, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1936-JAH-LL Inmate Booking No. 19778496,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STAY AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO STOP CATHERINE CRUMB, et al., PAYING FEE PAYMENT; and 16 Defendant. (2) SUA SPONTE GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

20 [ECF No. 14] 21 Daniel Dorado (“Plaintiff”) currently housed at George Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”) located in San Diego, California, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before this Court is Plaintiff’s “Request [that] the Court place all matters pertaining to this case on hold” and “stop proceedings to the Court without a fee payment.” (ECF No. 14.) / / / / / / I. Motion to Stay Plaintiff claims that because he is currently housed at GBDF he is “unable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.