McAllister
McAllister v. United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY McALLISTER, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01490-MMA-AHG Plaintiff, In Admiralty v. ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO AMEND
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; “K”
SCHEDULING ORDER
LINE RORO BULK SHIP
MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.;
[ECF No. 86] BELOCEAN SHIPPING, S.A.; PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS, LLC; and DOES 17 1-10, inclusive, 18 Defendants.
AND RELATED ACTIONS
21 22 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Amended Scheduling Order. ECF No. 86. Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence of the party seeking to amend the scheduling order and the reasons for seeking modification. Johnson v. Mammoth…