Clay

Clay v. Bigelo, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20213:21-cv-00285California4,317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN CLAYTON, Case No.: 21cv285-GPC(BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

v. PARTE APPLICATION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

BIGELO, LLC, a Nevada limited liability

ORDER

company; and DOES I-IX, inclusive, 15 Defendants. [Dkt. No. 5.]

17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte application for temporary restraining order 18 (“TRO”) filed on March 12, 2021. (Dkt. No. 5.) Defendant filed an opposition on March 19 17, 2021. (Dkt. No. 12.) Plaintiff filed a reply on March 22, 2021. (Dkt. No. 14.) A 20 hearing was held on March 23, 2021. (Dkt. No. 16.) Based on the parties’ briefs, the 21 supporting documentation, the applicable law, and the arguments at the hearing, the 22 Court DENIES Plaintiff’s ex parte application for temporary restraining order. 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 26 1 On March 23, 2021 Defendant filed a motion to strike reply as not authorized by the Court and raising additional arguments not raised in the motion. (Dkt. No. 15.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.