Grandesign Advertising Firm, Inc. v. Talon US (Grrandesign) LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20213:20-cv-00719California3,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GRANDESIGN ADVERTISING Case No. 3:20-cv-00719-LAB-DEE FIRM, INC.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff DISMISS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. V. 12(b)(2) [Dkt. 15] TALON US (GRANDESIGN) LLC and TALON OUTDOOR, LTD., Defendants. 17 || TALON US (GRANDESIGN) LLC, 18 Counterclaimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, ? V. GRANDESIGN ADVERTISING FIRM, INC., and AARON GAEIR, Counterclaim Defendant and Third- Party Defendant. 25 Plaintiff Grandesign Advertising Firm, Inc. (“Grandesign”) alleges that 27 || Talon US (Grandesign) LLC (“Talon US”) violated the Lanham Act by using 28 || Grandesign’s tradename and breached an Asset Purchase Agreement under 3:20-CV-00719-LAB-DEB

|| which Talon US acquired part of Grandesign’s business. Grandesign names 2 || Talon US’s ultimate parent, Talon Outdoor, Ltd. (“Talon …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.