Aragon

Aragon v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20213:19-cv-00438California6,507 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUGUSTINE ARAGON, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00438-BEN 3:17-cr-01068-BEN-1 Petitioner,

v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

CORRECT SENTENCE BUT

Respondent. STRIKING CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISED RELEASE 4, 5, AND

16 13 17 [ECF Nos. 89, 92, 95]

Petitioner Augustine Aragon moves under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“Section 2255”) to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence. ECF No. 89. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is DENIED.2 22 23 In reviewing Petitioner’s motion, the Court is mindful that “[a] document filed pro se is to be liberally construed . . . and a pro se [pleading], however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” 25 Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (citations omitted). All ECF. No. references are to the criminal case, 3:17-cr-1068-BEN-1. 2 Petitioner’s Motion to Compel Discovery, ECF No. 92, is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.