Costagenics

BestLife Holdings, Inc. v. Costagenics

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20213:20-cv-01209California4,934 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CENEGENICS, LLC, Case No.: 20-cv-1209-WQH-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. COSTAGENICS, dba ANTI AGING CLINIC COSTA RICA, dba HGH & 15 TESTOSTERONE TREATMENT; and JOHN DOES 1-10, unidentified individuals and/or entities, 17 Defendants. 18 HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motion to Substitute BestLife Holdings, Inc. as Plaintiff in this Action (ECF No. 11) and the Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 12) filed by Plaintiff Cenegenics, LLC. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On June 29, 2020, Plaintiff Cenegenics, LLC (“Cenegenics”) filed a Complaint against Defendants including Costagenics, d/b/a Anti Aging Clinic Costa Rica, d/b/a HGH & Testosterone Treatment (“Costagenics”). (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff brings claims against Defendants for trademark infringement and for unfair competition under federal and California law. Costagenics is the only remaining named Defendant. On October 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Proof of Service as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.