Mascrenas

Mascrenas v. Wagner

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20213:19-cv-02014California4,796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 19cv2014-WQH(BLM) RICHARD MASCRENAS,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S (1)

v. MOTION TO COMPEL, (2) MOTION

FOR SUBPOENAS, AND (3) REQUEST

OFFICER WAGNER,

FOR RULING

Defendants.

[ECF NOS. 42, 44, and 50] 17 Currently before the Court is (1) Plaintiff’s January 8, 2021 Motion to Compel Defendant in Producing Documents that were Requested by Plaintiff Twice [ECF No. 42], (2) Plaintiff’s January 8, 2021 Motion for Duces Tecum so Court Can Subpoena Video Records of Vibra Hospital, Where Incident Occurred [ECF No. 44] and Defendant’s response [ECF No. 46], and (3) Plaintiff’s March 1, 2021 Request for Court to Rule on Responses Plaintiff Believes are Deficient [ECF No. 50], Defendant’s March 15, 2021 Opposition [ECF No. 54], and Plaintiff’s March 24, 2021 reply [ECF No. 55]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.