Fulton
Fulton v. San Diego Backflow Test
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ANDREW MICHAEL FULTON, Case No.: 21-CV-369-JLS (NLS) an individual; JENIFER RUTH SNYDER, 13 an individual; SAN DIEGO BACKFLOW ORDER DENYING WITHOUT TESTING, INC., a California corporation; PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ and SAN DIEGO BACKFLOW MOTION TO REQUEST 15 TESTING, a California entity, APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 16 Plaintiffs, (ECF No. 9) 17 v.
SAN DIEGO BACKFLOW TEST,
a California entity; FARZIN BAZADEH, aka FRED BAZADEH, an individual; and 20 DOES 1 through 15, inclusive, 21 Defendants.
Presently before the Court is a letter from Defendants Farzin Bazadeh and San Diego Backflow Test (collectively, “Defendants”), which the Court construes as a motion to appoint counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 9). The Motion indicates that Defendants “can not afford an attorney,” so “[they] need a Public Defender to help [them] fight this case.” Id. at 1. / / / As an initial matter, pursuant to this District’s Local Rules: Only natural persons…