Vanis

Vanis v. Nielsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20213:20-cv-01047California1,568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TRACY VANIS, Case No.: 20cv1047-JAH (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING THE FIRST

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

AGENCY; KIRSTJEN NIELSEN,

Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, 16 Defendants.

18 On June 8, 2020, Plaintiff Tracy Vanis, proceeding pro se (“Plaintiff”), filed a 19 Complaint against the United States Transportation Security Administration Agency and 20 Kirstjen Nielsen, the Secretary of the United States of America Department of Homeland 21 Security (“Defendants”), alleging unlawful discrimination under Title VII of the Civil 22 Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter, “Title VII”). Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees 23 required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing. Instead, she filed a motion for leave 24 to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Doc. No. 2. 25 On October 15, 2020, the Court granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.