Lamar

Lamar v. Legoland California, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20213:20-cv-01049California5,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOYCE CASE, et. al, Case No.: 20cv01049 JAH-MSB 20cv01128 JAH-MSB Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

MERLIN ENTERTAINMENTS GROUP

DENYING IN PART PLAINTFFS’

U.S. HOLDINGS INC, et. al, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND Defendants. MOTION TO APPOINT INTERIM 15 COUNSEL [Doc. No. 21] and ORDER _________________________________ GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION JESSICA BAUTISTA, Individually and FOR APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM 17 on behalf of all others similarly situated, COUNSEL [Doc. No. 27] 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 MERLIN ENTERTAINMENTS GROUP U.S. HOLDINGS INC, et. al, 22 Defendants. 23 24 INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Joyce Case, William Lum and Tiffany Lamar (“Case Plaintiffs”), filed a motion to consolidate and appoint interim class counsel (Doc. No. 21) in Case v. Merlin 28 Entertainments Group U.S. Holding, Inc., 20cv1049. In response, Jessica Bautista, the plaintiff in the related matter Bautista v. Merlin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.