Carranza-Ambris
Carranza-Ambris v. The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAIME CARRANZA, individually and on Case No.: 20-cv-1819-DMS-WVG behalf of all others similarly situated,
ORDER (1) DENYING
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO v. STRIKE, (2) DENYING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL
DISMISS
COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
16 Defendant. 17 18 This case comes before the Court on Defendant The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership’s (“Terminix”) motion to strike Plaintiff Jaime Carranza’s class allegations, or in the alternative, to dismiss the out-of-state class members for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition, and Defendant filed a reply. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motions are denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges Defendant sent multiple automated text messages to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number in…