Schwerdtfeger
Schwerdtfeger v. Paramo
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20213:19-cv-02255California4,830 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL JOSEPH Case No.: 19-CV-2255 JLS (JLB)
SCHWERDTFEGER,
ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT
Plaintiff, AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF v. NO. 23); (2) OVERRULING
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS
PARAMO, Warden; R. BUCKEL, Assoc. THERETO (ECF NO. 25); Warden Business Services; and (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNKNOWN CDCR AGENT,
MOTION TO REVOKE
Supervisor of Plant Operations, PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. STATUS (ECF NO. 14); (4) DENYING
AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (ECF
NO. 9); AND (5) DECLINING TO
ADOPT AS MOOT REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 18)
AND DENYING AS MOOT
OBJECTIONS THERETO
(ECF NO. 19)
24 (ECF Nos. 9, 14, 18, 19, 23, 25)