Amaral

Amaral v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20213:17-cv-02409California4,918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCO AMARAL, an individual, Case No.: 3:17-cv-2409-L-LL

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

14 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 42) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court in this civil rights and tort lawsuit is Defendants City of San Diego and Jeffrey Williams’ (collectively, “Defendants”) motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 42). Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendants responded. (Doc. Nos. 43 and 45). The parties also filed a joint statement of undisputed material facts. (Doc. No. 44). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the motion as to the federal claims. The remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. BACKGROUND This case relates to a protest. On the evening of November 9, 2016, protesters marched in downtown…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.