Doe

Doe v. Hebbard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20213:21-cv-00039California1,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, Case No. 21-cv-00039-BAS-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND JAMES HEBBARD and DOES 1–20,

DENYING IN PART

Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY

AND TO STAY

PROCEEDINGS (ECF No. 5);

18 (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO

AMEND COMPLAINT (ECF

20 No. 7); AND 21 (3) VACATING SCHEDULING 22 ORDER. (ECF No. 6.)

24 25 26

28 Plaintiff Jane Doe is an inmate at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in San Diego, California. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Doe brings this civil rights action against a correctional officer, James Hebbard, alleging that Hebbard sexually assaulted her at the MCC. (Id.) Doe remains in federal custody. She moves to proceed anonymously to prevent humiliation and risk of further injury from the disclosure of her identity. (ECF No. 5.) In a separate motion, Doe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.