Frost

Frost v. Child and Family Services of San Bernardino County

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20213:20-cv-02402California916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN FROST, Case No.: 3:20-cv-2402-JLS-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

vs. PROCEED IFP

CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, and (ECF No. 6)

SAN BERNARDINO JUVENILE

COURT, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Ryan Frost, proceeding pro se, filed this action against Defendants Child and Family Services of San Bernardino County and San Bernardino Juvenile Court on December 8, 2020. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiff is alleging Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments violations based on Defendants placing Plaintiff’s three children in foster care. When Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s action but granted him leave to either pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 4. Plaintiff subsequently filed the present Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (“Mot.,” ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.