Parabia

State Bank of Texas v. Parabia

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20213:14-cv-03031California5,828 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STATE BANK OF TEXAS, Case No.: 14-cv-3031-L-DHB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SANCTIONS; BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

SAM PARABIA, ET AL.,

Defendants. [Doc No. 334] 16 Pending before the Court in this judicial foreclosure action is Motion for Sanctions Against Stephen F. Lopez, Esq. under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 filed by Plaintiff State Bank of Texas (the “Bank”). (Doc. no. 334.) Lopez, the counsel for Defendants Sam and Perin Parabia (together the “Parabias”), filed an opposition. (Doc. no. 335.) The Bank filed a reply. (Doc. no. 336.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), this motion is decided on the briefs without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. The Court reserves the issue of attorneys’ fees for decision upon further briefing. I. BACKGROUND The Parabias purchased a luxury residence located at 7213 Romero Drive in La Jolla, California, valued at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.