Neuhart
Neuhart v. Eaton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD MICHAEL NEUHART, Case No.: 3:21-cv-0419-GPC-WVG
Petitioner,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE P. EATON, Warden, Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner and proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, but has not paid the $5.00 filing fee and has not moved to proceed in forma pauperis. FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT A Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus must either be accompanied by a $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See Local Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with this action he must submit a copy of this Order with the requisite $5.00 fee or adequate proof he cannot pay the fee. BASIS FOR PETITION AND VENUE Further, the Court notes that, while Petitioner filed this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, it appears…