Diane Schroeder v. Stephen Hundley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DIANE SCHROEDER, an individual; Case No.: 17-CV-919-JLS (JMA) and EQUITY TRUST COMPANY
CUSTODIAN FBO DIANE ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
SCHROEDER IRA, PREJUDICE DEFENDANT
JASON CHAPPELL’S MOTION TO
Plaintiffs,
REQUEST CIVIL GIDEON RIGHTS
v. (ECF No. 76) STEPHEN HUNDLEY; JASON CHAPPELL; and DISTRESSED
ACQUISITIONS,
19 Defendants.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Jason Chappell’s Motion to Request Civil Gideon Rights (“Mot.,” ECF No. 76), which the Court construes as a motion to appoint counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). The Motion indicates that Mr. Chappell is “unemployed” and “ha[s] no assets that [he] is able to liquidate” to pay an attorney to represent him, and accordingly Mr. Chappell requests the Court to appoint counsel “[i]n accord with [his] Civil Gideon Rights.” Id. at 1. There is, however, no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case. Lassiter v. Dep’t of Social Servs., 452 U.S. 18,…