Shaughnessy

Shaughnessy v. LVNV Funding, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20213:20-cv-01809California4,233 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ||] GRADY SHAUGHNESSY, Case No.: 20-CV-1809-DMS-WVG Plaintitt, ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE 13 || V- 14 || LVNV FUNDING, LLC; RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P., Defendants. 17 Pending before this Court are the Parties’ briefs on the most recent discovery dispute this matter. (Doc. Nos. 37, 39.) In short, LVNV Funding, LLC (“LVNV’”) and Resurgent ||Capital Services, L.P. (collectively, “Defendants”) seek to depose Scott Grace (“Mr. ||Grace”), one of three attorneys presently representing Grady Shaughnessy □□□□ ||Shaughnessy” or “Plaintiff’) and who previously represented Mr. Shaughnessy in a prior ||related state court action. Mr. Shaughnessy objects to Defendants taking Mr. Grace’s deposition on relevance and privilege grounds. The Court has reviewed Defendants and ||Mr. Shaughnessy’s (“Parties”) respective briefs, counsels’ declarations, and all …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.