Banegas

Banegas v. Mansfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20213:20-cv-02142California717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN FERNANDO MEJIA BANEGAS, Case No.: 20cv2142-LAB (MSB) Booking #201237255,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiffs, ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY

FILING FEE REQUIRED

MICHAEL MANSFIELD, et al., BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR Defendants. FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 18 Plaintiff Juan Fernando Mejia Banegas, an Immigrations and Customs Enforcement detainee incarcerated at the Elroy Detention Center and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil right complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Because Plaintiff is in federal custody alleging constitutional violations by federal officers the Court will construe his Complaint as an action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff alleges two Border Patrol Officers used…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.