Newsom

Metroflex Oceanside LLC v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20213:20-cv-02110California3,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 METROFLEX OCEANSIDE LLC et al., Case No.: 20-CV-2110-CAB-AGS

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

GAVIN NEWSOM et al., [Doc. Nos. 26-30] Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiffs are ten gyms and fitness centers located in San Diego County. On October 27, 2020, they filed a complaint for damages and seeking to enjoin enforcement of various government orders restricting operation of their facilities to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus. After Defendants separately filed five motions to dismiss the original complaint, Plaintiffs filed the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) on January 15, 2021. Defendants now have filed a total of five separate motions to dismiss the FAC. The motions are fully briefed, and the Court deems them suitable for submission without oral argument. As discussed below, the motions are granted, and the FAC is dismissed. I. Background The parties, the Court, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.