The Eclipse Group LLP v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20213:15-cv-01411California2,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE ECLIPSE GROUP LLP, Case No.: 15-CV-1411 JLS (BLM) a California limited-liability partnership,

ORDER DENYING

Plaintiff, INTERVENOR’S MOTION v. FOR RECONSIDERATION

TARGET CORPORATION, et al., (ECF No. 263) Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Intervenor Stephen M. Lobbin’s Motion for Reconsideration (“Mot.,” ECF No. 263). Also before the Court are Defendant Target Corporation’s (“Target”) Opposition to Intervenor’s Motion for Reconsideration (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 265) and Intervenor’s Reply re Motion for Reconsideration (“Reply,” ECF No. 266). Plaintiff The Eclipse Group LLP (“Eclipse”) did not file any briefing on the Motion. The Court vacated the hearing and took the Motion under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 267. Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.