The Eclipse Group LLP v. Target Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE ECLIPSE GROUP LLP, Case No.: 15-CV-1411 JLS (BLM) a California limited-liability partnership,
ORDER DENYING
Plaintiff, INTERVENOR’S MOTION v. FOR RECONSIDERATION
TARGET CORPORATION, et al., (ECF No. 263) Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Intervenor Stephen M. Lobbin’s Motion for Reconsideration (“Mot.,” ECF No. 263). Also before the Court are Defendant Target Corporation’s (“Target”) Opposition to Intervenor’s Motion for Reconsideration (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 265) and Intervenor’s Reply re Motion for Reconsideration (“Reply,” ECF No. 266). Plaintiff The Eclipse Group LLP (“Eclipse”) did not file any briefing on the Motion. The Court vacated the hearing and took the Motion under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 267. Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court DENIES…