Newlin

Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Newlin

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20213:20-cv-00765California9,757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY Case No.: 20cv765-GPC(DEB)

OF CONNECTICUT,

ORDER GRANTING TRAVELERS’

Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS THE v. AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM BY

THE NEWLINS AND DENYING

ANTHONY and BLYTHE NEWLIN, as TRAVELERS’ MOTION TO individuals; QUADE & ASSOCIATES,

DISMISS THE AMENDED

PLC, a California professional liability

COUNTERCLAIM BY QUADE

company; AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY 16 COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, [Dkt. Nos. 85, 86.] and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants and Related Counterclaims and Third- Party Complaints.

21 Before the Court are Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Travelers Indemnity Company 22 of Connecticut’s (“Travelers”) motions to dismiss the amended counterclaims filed by 23 Anthony and Blythe Newlin (the “Newlins”), and Quade & Associates, PLC (“Quade”) 24 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.