McMorrow

McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20213:17-cv-02327California2,022 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK MCMORROW, et al., Case No. 17-cv-02327-BAS-JLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. EX PARTE MOTION TO STAY

PENDING DISPOSITION OF RULE

MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL, INC., 23(f) PETITION (ECF No. 178) Defendant.

16 17 On March 8, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. (Order, ECF No. 172.) Defendant Mondelēz Global LLC (MDLZ) petitioned the Ninth Circuit for permission to appeal the class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f). McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc., No. 21-80019 (9th Cir.), Pet. for Permission to Appeal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f), ECF No. 1. MDLZ argues that the Court erred in ruling that (1) Plaintiffs’ conjoint analysis sets forth a class-wide damages model in satisfaction of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 569 U.S. 27, 35 (2013); and (2) the falsity of the term “nutritious” is susceptible to common proof. Id. MDLZ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.