Saul

Johnson v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20213:20-cv-00747California2,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES JOHNSON, Case No.: 20-CV-747 JLS (AHG)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. EX PARTE EMERGENCY MOTION

TO SET ASIDE JUDGEMENT OF

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner,

JANUARY 25TH, 2021

Social Security Administration, 15 Respondent. (ECF No. 33) 16 17 Presently before the Court is Petitioner James Johnson’s Ex Parte Emergency Motion to Set Aside Judgement of January 25th, 2021 (“Mot.,” ECF No. 33), which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration of its January 25, 2021 Order (the “Order,” ECF No. 31). Having carefully considered Petitioner’s arguments and the law, the Court DENIES the Motion. BACKGROUND Petitioner initiated this action on April 20, 2020. See ECF No. 1. On June 15, 2020, the Court granted Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) but dismissed without prejudice Petitioner’s writs for failure to state a claim. See generally ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.