Moore

Moore v. Lankford

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20213:19-cv-02406California1,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 19CV2406-DMS (BLM) ROBERT MOORE,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

v. [ECF No. 42] JOE LANKFORD, MERCEDES ARELLANO, R.

BUCKEL, AND DAVID STROMSKI,

15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s February 25, 2021 Motion To Compel Discovery [ECF No. 42 (“MTC”)], Defendant Arellano’s March 12, 2021 Opposition to the motion [ECF No. 46 (“Oppo.”)], and Plaintiff’s March 30, 2021 reply [ECF No. 48 (“Reply”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. MOTION TO COMPEL On November 30, 2020, Plaintiff served his Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents (“RFPs”) on Defendant Arellano. MTC at 2 and 10-12 (“Plaintiff’s Decl.”) at ¶ 2, Exh. 1; see also Oppo. at 3; ECF No. 46-1, Declaration of Christopher H. Findley In Support of Defendant Arellano’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (“Findley Decl.”) at ¶ 5. The request contained one RFP,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.