Sikking
Sikking v. Housing of Urban Development (HUD)
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFF SIKKING, et al. Case No.: 19CV1004-LAB (KSC)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v. RICHARD C. GRISWOLD, et al. Defendants. 16 On February 1, 2021, the Court granted in part Defendants’ motions to dismiss and directed Plaintiffs, if they thought theyr could successfully amend, to file an ex parte motion for leave to amend. That motion, they were cautioned, had to comply fully with Civil Local Rule 15.1 and was not to include any claims against Defendants Griswold, Chase Bank, or any other previously-dismissed defendants. The Court also dismissed claims by Plaintiff Leon Qiyam-Pogue for failure to show that the Court had jurisdiction over his claims. The Court permitted Plaintiffs Barbara and Jeff Sikking to seek leave to file an amended complaint, within certain limits. They were required to comply with Civil Local Rule 15.1 and not to include claims dismissed without leave to amend. On March 1, Plaintiffs…