Vader
Vader v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD V., Case No.: 19-cv-01660-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW SAUL, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 [ECF Nos. 18; 25] 17 Plaintiff Richard V. has filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking judicial review the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). (ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court and ready for judicial decision are the parties’ cross- motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18), DENIES the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 25), reverses the decision of the Commissioner, and remands this matter for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). /// /// …