Sihler

Sihler v. The Fulfillment Lab, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20213:20-cv-01528California9,435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JANET SIHLER, individually and on Case No.: 3:20-cv-01528-H-MSB behalf of all others similarly situated;

CHARLENE BAVENCOFF, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

individually and on behalf of all MOTION TO DISMISS others similarly situated, PLAINTIFFS’ CLRA, FAL, UCL,

AND RICO CLAIMS AND

Plaintiffs, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFFS’ NON-CALIFORNIA

THE FULFILLMENT LAB, INC;

CONSUMER PROTECTION STATE

RICHARD NELSON; BEYOND

LAW CLAIMS

GLOBAL INC.; and DOES 1-10,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 38.] 19 On January 7, 2021, Plaintiffs Janet Sihler and Charlene Bavencoff filed their First 20 Amended Complaint (“FAC”) alleging Defendants The Fulfillment Lab, Inc. (“TFL”), 21 Richard Nelson, and Beyond Global Inc. had violated numerous consumer protection laws. 22 (Doc. No. 32.) On February 22, 2021, Defendants TFL, Richard Nelson, and Beyond 23 Global Inc. filed a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.