Bonilla

Bonilla v. Meza

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20213:21-cv-00579California1,572 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No. 3:21-cv-0579-MMA-LL

CDCR #J-48500,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);

[Doc. No. 2] MEZA, et al.,

Defendants. DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 18 19 20 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison, has filed a civil action pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming the prosecutor in his criminal action committed “fraud on the court” and arguing the California state court lacked jurisdiction to convict him. Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendants to declare his Alameda County Superior Court conviction and sentence void. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee required to commence a civil action; instead, he has filed a Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.