Santini

Santini v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20213:20-cv-00773California5,352 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 GEORGE S., Case No.: 20cv0773-RBB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR REVERSAL AND/OR

REMAND [ECF NO. 17]

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant.

19 On April 23, 2020, Plaintiff George S.1 commenced this action against Defendant 20 Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, for judicial review under 42 U.S.C. 21 § 405(g) of a final adverse decision for disability insurance benefits and supplemental 22 security income [ECF No. 1]. On May 11, 2020, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of 23 24 25 26 1 The Court refers to Plaintiff using only his first name and last initial pursuant to the Court's Civil Local Rules. See S.D. Cal. Civ. R. 7.1(e)(6)(b). this Court [ECF No. 8]. Defendant filed the Administrative Record on July 20, 2020 [ECF No. 13]. On August 25, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reversal and/or Remand [ECF No. 17]. Defendant filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.