Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20213:18-cv-00361California1,677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART

vs. AND DENYING IN PART MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

DANIEL PARAMO, et al., (2) DENYING REQUESTS FOR A Defendants. CHANGE OF VENUE AND LAW

LIBRARY ACCESS

(ECF No. 229)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed’s Reply to Reconsideration Motion Denial (“Mot.,” ECF No. 229), which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration of its March 8, 2021 Order (the “Order,” ECF No. 222). Having considered carefully Plaintiff’s arguments and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion but DENIES Plaintiff’s requests for a change of venue and law library access. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a pro se inmate proceeding in forma pauperis, initiated this action alleging civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.