Salmen
Salmen v. California Department of Correction Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SALMEN, CDCR #BK-5881, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02088-GPC-KSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION
v. FOR SERVICE OF DISCOVERY
AND (2) DENYING MOTION TO
CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF
SEAL
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION; S. ROBERTS; M.
[Doc. No. 38] GLYNN; J. HODGES; A. KENDALL;
DR. CHAU; H. FRANKLIN; S.
ANDERSON; A. SHITTU; S. GATES,
18 Defendants.
Plaintiff Justin Salmen (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 7. Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Notice of Need for Documents to be Forwarded to Party with Files,” which the Court will construe as a Motion to have the Court serve plaintiff’s previously- filed discovery requests upon defendant (the “Motion” or “Mot.”) Doc. No. 38. Plaintiff also requests that his Motion be “ke[pt] confidential,” which the Court will construe as a Motion to Seal. See id. at 2. For the reasons…