Bonilla

Bonilla v. Meza

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20213:21-cv-00387California1,702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00387-BAS-LL

CDCR #J-48500,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) AMALIA MEZA, Judge, et al., (ECF No. 2) Defendants. AND

18 (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING

FEE REQUIRED BY

20 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 21 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, proceeding pro se, and currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison, has filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Bonilla names six California State Superior Court Judges as Defendants, claiming they participated in a conspiracy to deprive him of due process “in a plot to murder him under the color of law.” (See “Compl.,” ECF No. 1 at 1.) Bonilla asks that this Court void his conviction in Alameda County Superior Court Case No. H-12210-A for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.