McCullock

McCullock v. Scharr

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20213:19-cv-02110California1,754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT MCCULLOCK, Case No.: 3:19-cv-2110-DMS-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) RESETTING TELEPHONIC N. SCHARR, et al.,

MANDATORY SETTLEMENT

Defendants. CONFERENCE;

16 (2) GRANTING MOTION TO EXCUSE APPEARANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS; and

(3) DENYING REQUEST FOR CDCR

COUNSEL TO BE ON TELEPHONIC

STANDBY

21 [ECF No. 38] 22 On April 5, 2021, Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher referred the Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) in this matter, as well as the related Ex Parte Application to Excuse Appearance of Defendants and to Allow Counsel Appearing on Behalf of CDCR to Appear Telephonically at the MSC (ECF No. 38), to the undersigned. ECF No. 42. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the MSC will be held on May 17, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. Since Plaintiff is incarcerated in a penal institution, the MSC will take…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.