Connor

Connor v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20213:10-cv-01284California2,180 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 Patricia Connor, Individually and on Case No.: 3:10-cv-1284-GPC-BGS behalf of all those similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR A SECOND v. DISTRIBUTION TO CLASS

MEMBERS AND CY PRES

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al., DISTRIBUTION FROM THE Defendants. RESIDUAL SETTLEMENT FUND

[ECF No. 166.] 21 Before the Court is Plaintiff Patricia Connor’s Motion for a Second Distribution to Class Members and Cy Pres Distribution from the Residual Settlement Fund. ECF No. 166. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. has filed a response noting that it does not object to the relief requested in Plaintiff’s Motion, and specifically does not oppose Plaintiff’s selection of cy pres recipients. ECF No. 169. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion. The hearing on this matter is hereby VACATED. \ \ \ I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.