Valentin

Valentin v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20213:21-cv-00643California510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 PAUL V., Case No.: 21cv643-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

Social Security, 12 [ECF No. 2] Defendant. 13 On April 13, 2021, Paul V. (“Plaintiff”) filed this social security appeal pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the denial of his application for Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income benefits. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff simultaneously filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed

25 1 In addition to the $350.00 statutory fee,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.