Snow

Snow v. Chula Vista and Escondido Parole Office/s

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20213:21-cv-00622California951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 AARON JOSEPH SNOW, CASE NO. 21cv622-LAB-KSC Plaintiff,

ORDER:

12 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

CHULA VISTA AND ESCONDIDO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

PAROLE OFFICE/S, [Dkt. 2]; and Defendants. 2) ORDER DISMISSING

COMPLAINT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

19 Plaintiff Aaron Snow filed this lawsuit against the Chula Vista and Escondido Parole Offices, alleging breach of contract and seeking to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Snow’s IFP application states that his average monthly income over the previous year was approximately $956 “after deductions.” (Dkt. 2.) His expenses vary, but amount to roughly the same number each month. He is unemployed and has no cash or other assets. The Court finds that Snow is unable to pay the filing fee, so his motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. But a claim for relief, it is DISMISSED WITHOUT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.