Snow
Snow v. Chula Vista and Escondido Parole Office/s
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20213:21-cv-00622California951 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 AARON JOSEPH SNOW, CASE NO. 21cv622-LAB-KSC Plaintiff,
ORDER:
12 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
CHULA VISTA AND ESCONDIDO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
PAROLE OFFICE/S, [Dkt. 2]; and Defendants. 2) ORDER DISMISSING
COMPLAINT WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
19 Plaintiff Aaron Snow filed this lawsuit against the Chula Vista and Escondido Parole Offices, alleging breach of contract and seeking to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Snow’s IFP application states that his average monthly income over the previous year was approximately $956 “after deductions.” (Dkt. 2.) His expenses vary, but amount to roughly the same number each month. He is unemployed and has no cash or other assets. The Court finds that Snow is unable to pay the filing fee, so his motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. But a claim for relief, it is DISMISSED WITHOUT…