Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. U.D. Electronic Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20213:20-cv-01676California10,940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC., a ) Case No.: 3:20-cv-01676-BEN-DEB Delaware corporation, ) Related Case: 3:18-cv-00373-BEN- 12 ) MSB Plaintiff, ) v. ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 14 ) MOTION TO DISMISS U.D. ELECTRONIC CORP., a Taiwan ) corporation, ) [ECF Nos. 13, 16, 18] 16 Defendant. ) 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Plaintiff” or “Pulse”) brings this action for patent infringement against Defendant U.D. Electronic Corp., a Taiwan corporation (“Defendant” or “UDE”). Complaint, ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Motion”). ECF No. 13. The Motion was submitted on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and Rule 78(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”). ECF No. 19. After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.