Fernandez

Fernandez v. CoreLogic Credco, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20213:20-cv-01262California2,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCO A. FERNANDEZ, individually Case No.: 3:20-cv-1262-JM-(AGS) and as a representative of the class,

ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY

Plaintiff, PROCEEDINGS PENDING v. SUPREME COURT’S DECISION

CORELOGIC CREDCO, LLC.,

15 Defendant. 16 This matter comes before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Supreme Court’s Decision in Transunion LLC v. Ramirez. (Doc. No. 23.) The motion has been fully briefed and the court finds it suitable for determination on the papers in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is granted. Background On June 2, 2020, Plaintiff Marco A. Fernandez filed a putative class action complaint against Defendant CoreLogic Credco, LLC (“Credco”) in San Diego Superior Court alleging violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. section 1681, et seq.; willful violations of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.