Arrant
Arrant v. Zambrano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN RAY ARRANT Case No.: 3:20-cv-01220-JLS-AGS CDCR No. K98602,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT vs. UNDER FED. R. CIV. PRO. 59(E)
M. ZAMBRANO, et al.,
15 Defendants. (ECF No. 17) 16 17 18 On June 29, 2020, Plaintiff Melvin Ray Arrant filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a motion for temporary restraining order (“TRO”). ECF Nos. 1–3. On September 9, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP, denied his TRO, and dismissed the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b). ECF No. 6. The Court granted Plaintiff sixty (60) days to file an amended complaint. Id. On September 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Finding and Recommendations to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b),” which…