Kideckel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENT KIDECKEL, Case No. 3:20-cv-0681-DMS-JLB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO v. DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

14 Defendant. 15 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff Brent Kideckel’s motion to dismiss. Defendant Wells Fargo opposes the motion. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND On February 28, 2020, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the instant action in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego alleging that Defendant violated the United States Expedited Funds Availability Act, 12 U.S.C. § 4001, et seq. (See ECF No. 1-2, at 2–6.) Defendant removed the case to this Court on April 8, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On December 31, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss this case. (ECF No. parties to bear their own costs. (Id.) Defendant filed an opposition…