Finnegan

Finnegan v. Gallagher Bassett Services Lemonade

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20213:21-cv-00666California1,531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Sean Matthew Finnegan, Case No.: 3:21-cv-0666-GPC-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Gallagher Basset Services; Lemonade

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS Defendants.

AND

17 (2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 20 On April 15, 2021, Plaintiff Sean Matthew Finnegan (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Gallagher Basset Services and Lemonade (“Defendants”). ECF No. 1. Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. \ \ \ \ \ \ DISCUSSION I. Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis All parties instituting any civil action, suit or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.