RICMIC LLC v. Salient Networks, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20213:20-cv-02015California4,741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICMIC, LLC, a California limited liability company, Case No.: 20-CV-2015-CAB-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS THE

13 v. COMPLAINT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SALIENT NETWORKS, INC., a 12(B)(6) AND 35 U.S.C. § 101 15 California corporation,

16 Defendant. [Doc. No. 7]

18 Before the Court is the motion to dismiss the complaint filed by Defendant Salient Networks, Inc. [Doc. No. 7.] Salient argues that United States Patent Nos. 9,305,450 B2 (“the ‘450 Patent”) and 10,380,873 B1 (“the ‘873 Patent”) (together, the “Asserted Patents”), which Plaintiff RICMIC, LLC asserts against Salient, are invalid because they are not directed to patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. §101. RICMIC opposed the motion. [Doc. No. 12.] For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied. 25 26 27 28 I. Background The asserted patents are both titled “Interactive …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.