Mahil
Mahil v. Option Care Enterprises, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HARJIT MAHIL, Case No.: 20cv1559-BEN-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S
MOTION TO COMPEL
OPTION CARE ENTERPRISES,
INDEPENDENT MEDICAL
INC.,
EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF; Defendant. AND (2) AMENDING THE SCHEDULING ORDER
17 [ECF No. 17]
19 On April 9, 2021, Option Care Enterprises, Inc. (“Defendant”) moved to compel the independent mental examination (“IME”) of Harjit Mahil (“Plaintiff”) by Dr. Francine Kulick pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35(a). (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff opposes, arguing that Defendant “is belatedly trying to backdoor a retained expert that it should have designated in its expert disclosures under the guise of a ‘rebuttal expert.’” (Id. at 7). Plaintiff also contends that her mental health condition is not in controversy there are two issues before the Court: (1)…