Brooks
Brooks v. Bank of America, NA
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM NORMAN BROOKS, III, Case No. 20-cv-01348-BAS-LL on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT v.
(ECF No. 16)
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
15 Defendant. 16 Defendant moves to dismiss two counts alleged in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for failing to state claims upon which relief can be granted. (Mot. to Dismiss FAC (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff opposes, and Defendant replies. (ECF Nos. 17, 18.) The Court finds the Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background This action arises from Defendant’s decision to suspend Plaintiff’s access…