Dr. Mickey Socrates Ferdynand v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20213:21-cv-00203California612 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DR. MICKEY SOCRATES Case No. 21-cv-00203-BAS-MSB

FERDYNAND®,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, WITHOUT PREJUDICE v.

TARGET CORPORATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Dr. Mickey Socrates Ferdynand® filed this action on February 3, 2021, against Target Corporation and the Department of Homeland Security. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff is proceeding without an attorney. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee nor moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court’s mail sent to Plaintiff’s address on file returned as undeliverable. (ECF Nos. 4–5.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to (1) file a correct address with the Court and (2) show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee by April 21, 2021. (Order, ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s Order. “District courts have the inherent power to control their dockets and, ‘[i]n the exercise of that power they may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.