Krause-Pettai

Krause-Pettai v. Unilever United States, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20213:20-cv-01672California5,354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICOLE KRAUSE-PETTAI, SCOTT Case No.: 20cv1672 DMS (BLM)

GRIMM, STEVE TABU LANIER,

12 CHRISTY STEVENS, individually and ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND on behalf of all others similarly situated, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs, v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC., a corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 This case comes before the Court on Defendant Unilever United States, Inc.’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion, and Defendant filed a reply brief. For the reasons set out below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. / / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Nicole Krause-Pettai, Scott Grimm, Steve Tabu Lanier and Christy Stevens are consumers who purchased a variety of products manufactured by Defendant Unilever United States, Inc. Plaintiff Krause-Pettai…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.