Hopper

Mitchell v. Hopper

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20213:19-cv-00006California1,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORREY MITCHELL, Case No.: 19-cv-006 JLS (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

LT. G. HOPPER, et al.,

Defendants. (ECF No. 39) 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Correy Mitchell’s Request for Reconsideration by the District Court Judge’s Ruling Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claims (“Mot.,” ECF No. 39). After reviewing Plaintiff’s arguments and the law, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. BACKGROUND On January 2, 2019, Plaintiff Correy Mitchell, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, commenced this action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. On January 25, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff IFP status. ECF No. 3. On September 27, 2019, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 12 (“FAC”). Plaintiff alleged Defendants violated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.