Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20213:18-cv-00361California1,083 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

vs. RECONSIDERATION

DANIEL PARAMO, et al., (ECF Nos. 230, 232) Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed’s Reply to This Court’s April 6, 2021 Order (“Mot.,” ECF No. 232), which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration of its April 6, 2021 Order (the “Order,” ECF No. 230). Having considered carefully Plaintiff’s arguments and the applicable law, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a pro se inmate proceeding in forma pauperis, initiated this action alleging civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 9, 2018. See ECF No. 1. Defendants’ fully briefed motion for summary judgment currently is pending before Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher. See ECF No. 181. / / / Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.